On  16 September 1963, all the elements  were in place for the  unfolding  of a political story which, whatever  its outcome would be, was  certain  to go through strange and wrenching  twists of plot. Some of  these  elements were clear to see, others  hidden. 
Each  partner-to-be in the  Malaysian enterprise joined with vastly   differing experiences and  expectations. The only thing they had in   common was that each territory  was home to a bewildering variety of   peoples, languages and cultures,  and none of these people had ever  known  anything except authoritarian  rule. Upon what did they believe  they  were to agree?
As  we have seen, Malaysia was a  marriage of convenience, particularly   for the convenience of the  Malayan élite and the British. Love had no   place in the arrangement,  and inevitably members would be fighting as  to  who “wore the pants” in  the foursome. KL took a traditional Islamic   view of the federation. KL  was the husband, and he took three wives.   Singapore disputed KL’s  position and demanded to be treated as an  equal  partner. KL booted  Singapore out of Malaysia.
That  left Semenanjung and Sabah  and Sarawak. KL was hardly as noble  as  D’Artagnan, and the principle  that governed Federal/East M’sian   relations was not “One for all and  all for one.” The mere notion of   treating others as equal partners is  as repugnant to the Malay élite as  a  ham sandwich.
My main source for today’s piece is Michael Leigh’s The Rising Moon: Political Change in Sarawak,    published by Sydney University Press 1974. Much has happened since    then, but Leigh’s study remains quite fresh. The pattern of    Sarawak/Semenanjung relations Leigh demonstrates at the very beginning    of Malaysia remains intact today.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment