Top posts

Featured Posts

BERSIH dan Pemimpin Siswa Gesa Polis Bebaskan Pemimpin Siswa Yang Ditahan Hari Ini di IPD KK

Borneo Herald
2.00PM MYT, 4-3-2026


Oleh Fadhil Kasim, Tawau
(1) KAMI menggesa pembebasan serta-merta Sudirman Arshad, Mahasiswa Hubungan Antarabangsa UMS yang kini ditahan polis ketika hadir hari ini di IPD Kota Kinabalu untuk memberi keterangan di bawah Seksyen 4(1) Akta Hasutan 1948.

(2) Siasatan ini adalah berhubung perkongsian Sudirman yang menjelaskan bahawa kedudukan TYT Sabah bukanlah kuasa mutlak dan boleh dipecat melalui mekanisme yang diperuntukkan dalam Perlembagaan Negeri Sabah dengan sokongan dua per tiga Dewan Undangan Negeri. Kenyataan tersebut mempunyai asas undang-undang yang kuat, jelas dan teliti.

(3) Menjelaskan fakta perlembagaan bukan satu jenayah. Dalam sistem demokrasi berperlembagaan, semua jawatan tertakluk kepada peruntukan perundangan sebagai mekaniskme semak dan imbang. Mengkriminalisasikan wacana perundangan rakyat hanya akan menjejaskan ruang kebebasan bersuara dan menyekat budaya intelektual masyarakat.

(4) Kerajaan MADANI di bawah pimpinan Anwar Ibrahim dan pentadbiran negeri Sabah di bawah Hajiji Noor tidak boleh terus berselindung di sebalik slogan reformasi sementara pada masa yang sama membiarkan undang-undang represif dan keji digunakan untuk membungkam rakyat yang bersuara. Jika benar komited kepada perubahan, hentikan segera intimidasi politik, tarik balik siasatan yang bermotif menakutkan awam, dan buktikan bahawa reformasi bukan sekadar retorik penuh kepalsuan.

(5) Bersih bersolidariti penuh bersama Sudirman Arshad dan seluruh mahasiswa yang berani berdiri di barisan hadapan mempertahankan hak bersuara, menjunjung prinsip keadilan dan tidak gentar menyatakan kebenaran demi maruah rakyat dan demokrasi negeri ini.

(6) Kami turut menggesa pemansuhan segera Akta Hasutan 1948 yang saban tahun digunakan autoriti sebagai alat menekan, menakut-nakutkan dan mengintimidasi para aktivis. Undang-undang lapuk ini tidak selari dengan semangat demokrasi seharusnya meraikan kebebasan ekspresi dan bersuara seperti yang dijamin perlembagaan negara.

Fadhil Kasim ialah seorang pemimpin siswa UMS dan juga naib pengerusi Bersih Sabah#~Borneo Herald™

No Such Thing As "Borneo Block" Controling Malaya, Only Equal Partners, Says PBK President

                              Voon Lee Shan

Borneo Herald 
10.00AM MYT, 4-3-2026


This is in response to comments made by some activists and politicians of a certain alleged "Borneo Bloc" for combined 56 Sabah and Sarawak MPs.


By Voon Lee Shan, Kuching
TODAY, Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) reaffirms a fundamental truth: there is no such thing as observed by PBK that there is a so-called “Borneo Bloc” conspiring to control Malaya. That narrative is a convenient distortion to confuse the general public. 

There is no unified bloc of Sabah and Sarawak acting as one political force to dominate anyone. In reality, both Sarawak and Sabah have been struggling—individually and consistently—to defend the rights guaranteed to them at the formation of Malaysia on 16 September 1963.

The historical record is clear. Malaysia was formed as a partnership of Malaya, Sarawak, Sabah, and Singapore. It was not meant to be an expansion of Malaya under a new name, Malaysia. 

The Federal Constitution remains fundamentally rooted in the Constitution of the Federation of Malaya, modified to admit new territories. What was promised as an equal partnership has, in practice, operated as central control by the federation of Malaya. 

 The balance of power within federal Parliament tells its own story: Sarawak holds 31 seats, Sabah 25—together insufficient to block federal legislation even when it directly affects their independence, resources, and future. This is seen by growing unsatisfaction of people of Borneo Territories of control and " political suffocation " of Borneo people. They are not able to protect their constitutional rights. 

Control of national policy, cabinet formation, and executive authority remains concentrated in the hands of Malaya. The Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Sabah and Sarawak are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, yet neither state has the institutional pathway to hold that highest office. Symbolism matters. Power structures matter even more.

The Petroleum Development Act 1974 marked a turning point. Through that Act, along with subsequent federal legislation such as the Continental Shelf framework and territorial sea expansions, oil and gas resources—long belonging to our territories of Sabah and Sarawak —were centralized under Petronas and effectively placed under the authority of the Prime Minister. The economic lifeblood of Borneo was transferred away from the people of Borneo.

Is not Malaya controlling Borneo Territories? 
How could Borneo territories even if there is a "Borneo Bloc" able to control Malaya? 

This is not a matter of sentiment. It is a matter of constitutional reality, political representation, and economic sovereignty.

It is difficult to convince rising "political tide" in Sabah and Sarawak that Sabah and Sarawak are not colonies of Malaya or at least been treated as colonies of Malaya. 

Parti Bumi Kenyalang states unequivocally:

Sarawak is not a colony.
Sabah is not a colony.
Malaysia was never meant to be a unitary state dominated by one region.

The call for restoration of rights is not extremism. It is not anti-federal. It is a legitimate demand grounded in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (if valid) and the principle of equal partnership.

We reject fear-based narratives that paint Bornean self-determination as aggression. We reject the myth of a “Borneo Bloc” seeking control over Malaya. The real imbalance lies elsewhere.

The time has come for honest national reflection.

If Malaysia is to endure as a just federation, it must confront its structural inequalities. True unity cannot be built upon centralization that sidelines founding partners. True federation cannot survive without genuine independence, fiscal justice, and political balance.

Parti Bumi Kenyalang stands firm:

Restore independence.
Restore resource rights.
Restore equal partnership.

Only then can Malaysia become what it was meant to be—not an enlargement of Malaya, but a federation of equals.


Voon Lee Shan is President of a Sarawak-based nationalist party, Parti Bumi Kenyalang#~Borneo Herald™

Apa Yang Armizan GRS Melalut Sedangkan GRS Sekongkol Dengan Parti Malaya?

                         Daniel John Jambun 

Borneo Herald 
9.45AM MYT, 1-3-2026


Oleh Daniel John Jambun, Inanam
BORNEO's Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) mengambil maklum kenyataan terkini oleh Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali, Timbalan Setiausaha Agung Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), yang menyeru supaya Sabah dan Sarawak membentuk satu blok bersatu menjelang Pilihan Raya Umum akan datang.

Dari segi prinsip, BoPiMaFo bersetuju bahawa Sabah dan Sarawak memiliki kekuatan signifikan di Parlimen. Dengan jumlah keseluruhan 57 kerusi, negeri-negeri Borneo berpotensi menjadi penentu dalam Parlimen yang sengit — sebagaimana yang terbukti selepas Pilihan Raya Umum Malaysia 2022.

Namun, angka semata-mata tidak mencipta daya tawar.
Daya tawar memerlukan kebebasan, kejelasan agenda, dan keberanian untuk berunding.

BoPiMaFo bimbang bahawa seruan kepada “blok Borneo bersatu” akan kedengaran kosong sekiranya kepimpinan politik Sabah masih bergantung secara struktur kepada gabungan berasaskan Semenanjung dan rangkaian naungan persekutuan.

Sabah tidak boleh secara kredibel mendakwa status sebagai penentu kuasa (kingmaker) sekiranya:

Mengelak daripada mengemukakan tuntutan tegas dan berjangka masa terhadap pelaksanaan Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 (MA63);

Bersikap berhati-hati dalam menegaskan hak perlembagaan berkaitan kelayakan hasil dan tadbir urus petroleum;

Terus menjalin jajaran politik yang melemahkan autonomi rundingan Sabah.

Kesatuan bukan sekadar slogan yang dilaungkan ketika musim pilihan raya.
Ia mesti dibuktikan melalui disiplin institusi dan pendirian perlembagaan sebelum undi dibuang.

Kesepaduan relatif Sarawak berpunca daripada dominasi parti tempatan yang konsisten serta kerangka rundingan yang jelas dengan Kerajaan Persekutuan. Sabah, sebaliknya, masih belum menginstitusikan satu platform Sabah-dahulu (Sabah-first) yang bersatu dan merentas parti serta mengikat Ahli-Ahli Parlimennya.

Sehubungan itu, BoPiMaFo menggesa para pemimpin Sabah supaya melangkaui retorik dan secara terbuka komited kepada:

1. Satu agenda Borneo bertulis yang tidak boleh dirunding sebelum PRU16;


2. Pendirian jelas mengenai kelayakan 40% hasil bersih di bawah Perkara 112C dan 112D Perlembagaan Persekutuan;


3. Kejelasan perlembagaan berhubung tadbir urus petroleum yang melibatkan Sabah;


4. Komitmen bersama bahawa sokongan persekutuan akan bersyarat kepada kemajuan yang boleh diukur dalam perkara-perkara tersebut.

Tanpa komitmen ini, perbincangan tentang menjadi blok penentu hanya berisiko menjadi penjenamaan politik semata-mata dan bukannya pembaharuan struktur.

Sabah tidak kekurangan kerusi.
Sabah kekurangan kesatuan politik yang boleh dikuatkuasakan.

Jika Sabah mahu berdiri sebagai rakan setara dalam Persekutuan, para pemimpinnya mesti terlebih dahulu menunjukkan kesediaan untuk berunding dari kedudukan kekuatan perlembagaan — bukan kebergantungan politik.

BoPiMaFo menegaskan bahawa daya tawar Borneo adalah nyata.
Namun daya tawar yang tidak digunakan, atau digunakan secara lemah, adalah daya tawar yang diserahkan.


Daniel John Jambun ialah Presiden
Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo)#~Borneo Herald™

Don’t Gamble Away Borneo’s Future Without Unity and Transparency

                            Voon Lee Shan

Borneo Herald 
9.30AM MYT, 1-3-2026



By Voon Lee Shan, Kuching
PARTI Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) demands immediate transparency from the GPS government over its decision to file a suit in the Federal Court to determine the constitutionality of the Petroleum Development Act 1974 and the Continental Shelf Act 1966.

Was the Sabah government consulted?
Was there consensus among Borneo leaders?
Was there a united strategy before declaring legal war against Putrajaya and Petronas?

The people of Sabah and Sarawak deserve answers.

This is not a minor administrative dispute. This is a battle that concerns the ownership, control, and destiny of our petroleum resources — resources that belong to the people of Borneo. The outcome of this legal challenge will shape generations to come.

PBK warns: if this suit fails and the Federal Court upholds both federal laws, what will be the consequences? Will Sarawak and Sabah lose leverage permanently? Will this strengthen federal control over our oil and gas resources for decades? Have the risks been carefully calculated?

A failed constitutional challenge will not just be a political setback — it may cement federal dominance over Borneo’s wealth. Sabahans may question whether Sarawak acted unilaterally. Distrust between the two Borneo states could grow. The people must not be divided because of poor foresight and lack of coordination.

PBK believes any move of this magnitude must be undertaken with:
• Full transparency to the rakyat
• Formal consultation with Sabah
• A united Borneo front
• A long-term legal and political strategy

You do not enter a constitutional war without securing your allies.

PBK maintains its long-standing position that the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) framework must be fundamentally examined. PBK received  many legal opinions from international lawyers  that MA63 is null  and  void ab initio and it could not be used as a basis to constitute Malaysia. If MA63 itself is legally defective, then all federal laws imposed upon Sabah and Sarawak under that framework are open to constitutional challenge. But such a position requires careful, strategic, and united action — not isolated moves that may weaken Borneo’s bargaining power.

We caution GPS:
Do not gamble with the future of our children.
Do not act without Sabah.
Do not risk generations of resource ownership on an uncertain legal strategy.

Borneo’s strength lies in unity — not unilateral action. Sarawak definitely doesn’t belong to GPS alone and GPS could not decide things alone. Had our Legislature been convened to discuss and debate on the matter? Had people of Sarawak in the streets been consulted and their opinions been sought before this legal and political war in the federal court against Petronas and the federal government? 
 
PBK stands firmly with the grassroots who demand dignity, sovereignty, and transparency. The people are watching. History will judge those who act without foresight. Sarawak deserves smart and intelligent leaders - leaders with wisdom and not leaders who take things all on their own without consultation with  people in such an important matter that will affect the life and livelihod of all Sarawakians and Sabahans. 

Enough secrecy. Enough political theatrics.
Show the people the plan — or withdraw the gamble.



Voon Lee Shan is a practicing lawyer and also currently the president of Parti Bumi Kenyalang#~Borneo Herald

Where Will Sarawak Go if it Loses the Federal Court Challenge Against PDA 1974 and CSA 1966?


                              Voon Lee Shan

Borneo Herald
8.28AM MYT, 27-2-2026


By Voon Lee Shan
KUCHING : Sarawak is not a colony.
Sarawak is not a subordinate territory.
Sarawak is an equal founding partner in Malaysia under MA63.

Today, the GPS government has brought before the Federal Court a challenge concerning the constitutionality of the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA 1974) and the Continental Shelf Act 1966 (CSA 1966) — two federal laws that stripped Sarawak of control over its own oil and gas resources.

Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) states firmly:

PDA 1974 must be repealed.

It was enacted without the sovereign consent of the people of Sarawak. It transferred ownership of Sarawak’s petroleum resources to Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) under circumstances that remain politically and historically contested.

For decades, Sarawak has received only a small royalty from resources extracted from our waters, while billions flowed out of our land. Meanwhile, rural Sarawak remains underdeveloped, infrastructure gaps persist, and our fiscal autonomy remains constrained.

This is not merely a legal technicality.
This is about economic justice and historical rectification.

The Federal Court Action — A High-Risk Gamble

PBK acknowledges that challenging the constitutionality of PDA 1974 and CSA 1966 is historic.

But let us be clear:

If Sarawak loses in Federal Court, the decision will not simply be a political setback — it will become a constitutional lock.

A defeat would:

* Permanently entrench federal ownership over Sarawak’s petroleum.
* Severely weaken future MA63 negotiations.
* Close constitutional doors for generations.
* Strengthen federal dominance over Sarawak’s economic lifeline.

This is why PBK demands transparency.

Before entering this constitutional battlefield, the GPS government has a political and moral obligation to disclose:

* What is the contingency plan if Sarawak loses?
* Is there a prepared legislative roadmap?
* Is there a political fallback strategy?
* Has a referendum mandate been considered?
* What is the economic risk assessment?

The people of Sarawak must not be kept in the dark.

The Unequal Risk Structure

Let us speak honestly.

PETRONAS has minimal structural risk in this litigation.

If PETRONAS wins:

* Federal control remains intact.
* Production Sharing Contracts remain valid.
* Commercial structures continue uninterrupted.

If Sarawak wins:

* Commercial contracts are still binding.
* Arbitration clauses remain enforceable.
* Operational dependence on existing infrastructure persists.

In both scenarios, PETRONAS survives.

But Sarawak risks constitutional finality.

This asymmetry must be acknowledged openly.

PBK’s Position — Repeal, Not Merely Litigate

PBK has consistently maintained:

PDA 1974 must be repealed — not merely interpreted.

The Act represents centralisation that contradicts the spirit of MA63 and undermines Sarawak’s fiscal sovereignty.

Repeal would:

* Restore true negotiating equality.
* Rebalance federal-state relations.
* Recognise Sarawak’s ownership rights.
* Allow a new petroleum framework based on partnership — not subordination.

Litigation without a broader political mobilisation strategy is dangerous.

If the court rules against Sarawak, PBK believes the struggle must shift to:

1. Constitutional amendment campaigns.
2. Political mandate from the people.
3. International awareness of MA63 obligations.
4. State-level assertion of regulatory and taxation powers.
5. Consideration of self-determination mechanisms consistent with constitutional processes.

Sarawak must never surrender its resource rights through judicial finality.

A Call to Sarawakians

This is not about hostility.
This is about dignity.
This is about our children’s inheritance.

Oil and gas are finite resources. Once extracted, they are gone forever.

If Sarawak fails to secure meaningful control now, future generations will inherit depleted reserves and continued fiscal dependence.

PBK therefore calls upon:

* The GPS government to disclose its full legal and political strategy.
* All Sarawak MPs and ADUNs to state their stand publicly.
* Civil society to engage in informed debate.
* Sarawakians to prepare to decide their political future with clarity.

Sarawak’s sovereignty over its resources is not negotiable.

PBK stands firm:

Repeal PDA 1974.
Restore Sarawak’s petroleum rights.
Honour MA63 in full.

Sarawak’s resources belong to Sarawak.


Voon Lee Shan is currently the President of
Parti Bumi Kenyalang#~Borneo Herald™

Sarawak Stands at a Crossroads : A New Path to Prosperity

Voon Lee Shan (right) in a photo with Sabahan activist Dr Kanul Gindol at the former's legal office in Kuching years back.

Borneo Herald 
9.40AM MYT, 21-2-2026


To the Dayak Community of Sarawak
By Voon Lee Shan
KUCHING : For too long, certain political actors have used fear-based messaging to influence our people. Phrases such as “Anang Ngelaban Perintah” (“Do not fight the government”) are repeatedly invoked to discourage legitimate democratic participation and silence rightful concerns.

Let us be clear:

Standing up for our rights is not fighting the government. It is exercising our democratic responsibility within the law.

A government is not owned by any political party. It belongs to the people. The schools our children attend, the clinics that treat our families, the roads that connect our longhouses — these are built using public funds contributed by the rakyat. They are not gifts from any political party, nor are they tools to threaten or intimidate voters.

1. Protecting Our Rights is Lawful and Just

PBK affirms that defending Native Customary Rights (NCR) land, cultural heritage, and constitutional rights is legitimate and lawful. Seeking transparency, accountability, and fairness is not rebellion — it is responsible citizenship.

No citizen should be made to feel that exercising democratic choice will result in punishment or withdrawal of public services. Such narratives are irresponsible and undermine the spirit of democracy.

2. Reject Politics of Fear

We urge Dayaks not to be swayed by fear-based campaigns that suggest:

* Development depends on loyalty to a particular political party.
* Public facilities will disappear if leadership changes.
* Questioning leaders equals disloyalty.

A functioning government continues regardless of which party holds office. Administrations change, but civil service, institutions, and public infrastructure remain to serve the people.

3. Think Critically, Choose Wisely

Not everything spoken by leaders should be accepted without reflection. Leaders, like all individuals, may have personal motives or political agendas. We encourage all voters to:

* Evaluate policies, not personalities.
* Examine track records, not rhetoric.
* Ask who truly benefits from certain decisions.

Democracy requires informed and thoughtful citizens — not blind loyalty.

4. Unity and Dignity of the Dayak People

The strength of the Dayak community lies in unity, wisdom, and courage. Our forefathers protected our land, customs, and dignity with resilience. Today, our struggle is not through confrontation, but through knowledge, lawful action, and responsible voting.

We must not allow ourselves to be divided or manipulated. The future of Sarawak belongs to all its people — not to any single group of politicians.



Parti Bumi Kenyalang calls upon all Dayaks:

* Do not fear exercising your democratic rights.
* Do not be misled by threats disguised as advice.
* Protect your rights within the law.
* Vote with wisdom, courage, and conscience.

A government should serve the people — not the other way around.

Let us move forward with clarity, dignity, and unity for the future of Sarawak.


Voon Lee Shan is the current president of a Sarawak political party, Parti Bumi Kenyalang#~Borneo Herald™


CAMOS Mengalu-alukan Cadangan Penubuhan Konsulat India di Sabah — Menuntut Penglibatan Langsung Sabah dan Tadbir Urus Selaras MA63

                          Daniel John Jambun 

Borneo Herald
10.48AM MYT, 17-2-2026


Oleh Daniel John Jambun 
Change Advocate Movement Sabah (CAMOS) mengalu-alukan kelulusan Kerajaan Persekutuan kepada Republik India untuk menubuhkan sebuah konsulat di Sabah.

Kehadiran konsulat asing di Sabah mencerminkan peningkatan kepentingan strategik dan ekonomi negeri ini di peringkat serantau. Jika diurus dengan baik, perkembangan ini berpotensi membuka laluan kerjasama dalam bidang perdagangan, pendidikan, pelancongan, pelaburan, serta pertukaran rakyat-ke-rakyat yang memberi manfaat langsung kepada rakyat Sabah.

Namun, CAMOS menegaskan bahawa Sabah tidak boleh dijadikan sekadar tuan rumah pasif sementara keputusan dan manfaat dipusatkan di tempat lain.

Sebarang penglibatan yang terhasil daripada cadangan konsulat India ini mesti melibatkan Sabah secara langsung — termasuk Kerajaan Negeri, pihak berkuasa tempatan, perniagaan berpangkalan di Sabah, masyarakat sivil, dan komuniti pribumi. Sabah mesti memainkan peranan bermakna dalam membentuk keutamaan, merundingkan rangka kerjasama, serta memastikan peluang ekonomi sampai kepada perusahaan dan komuniti tempatan.

CAMOS turut menegaskan bahawa pendekatan ini selaras dengan semangat Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 (MA63), yang mengiktiraf Sabah sebagai rakan pengasas dalam Persekutuan dengan perlindungan, identiti, dan kepentingannya sendiri. Inisiatif yang melibatkan Sabah di peringkat antarabangsa harus mencerminkan prinsip perkongsian, bukan kebergantungan.

Kami memberi amaran agar tidak mengulangi corak lampau di mana pelaburan luar dan penglibatan diplomatik memintas penyertaan tempatan, menyebabkan manfaat yang terhad kepada Sabah sementara pembuatan keputusan terus tertumpu di Putrajaya.

CAMOS mengalu-alukan cadangan konsulat India ini, dengan syarat Sabah dilayan bukan sekadar sebagai lokasi, tetapi sebagai pihak berkepentingan yang aktif dan setara dalam semua penglibatan yang terhasil. Proses yang telus, penyertaan tempatan, dan tadbir urus yang bertanggungjawab mesti menjadi panduan kerjasama ini.

Sabah yang lebih kuat akan mengukuhkan Malaysia. Reformasi sebenar bermula apabila rakyat Sabah disertakan sebagai rakan kongsi, bukan sekadar pemerhati.


Daniel John Jambun ialah Presiden
Change Advocate Movement Sabah (CAMOS)#~Borneo Herald™

Mukhriz Kecam Kenyataan Anwar "Tahan dan Humban"

Borneo Herald 
9.45AM MYT, 10-2-2026



Oleh Jayson Lisandu
KUALA LUMPUR : Presiden Pejuang, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir, menyifatkan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Anwar Ibrahim angkuh apabila membuat kenyataan berkenaan `tahan dan humban’ terhadap peserta demonstrasi yang didakwa cuba menggugat keselamatan negara.

Menurut beliau, negara ini mempunyai undang-undang dan Perlembagaan yang turut mempertahankan hak rakyat untuk bersuara. Rakyat juga berhak mengkritik kerajaan dan protes jalanan dibolehkan selagi dilakukan dengan tertib serta tidak mencetuskan huru-hara.

“Takkan Anwar tidak ingat zaman reformasi dulu, apa yang beliau tidak buat untuk jatuhkan kerajaan Tun M (Dr. Mahathir Mohamad).

"Bukan setakat demonstrasi, malah merusuh memanjang (sentiasa)," kata Mukhriz menerusi video di facebook senalam.

Menurut Mukhriz, apabila Ratu Elizabeth datang ke negara ini semasa Sukan Komanwel 1998, Anwar arah geng reformasinya untuk merusuh, nak tunjuk kepada tetamu diraja itu bahawa kononnya kerajaan ketika itu perasuah dan zalim.

Katanya lagi, sebaliknya hari ini rakyat Malaysia kini dihadkan hak bersuara ketika lawatan pemimpin antarabangsa seperti Presiden AS, Donald Trump, dan Perdana Menteri India, Narendra Modi.
 
“Anwar dan Kerajaan Madani memang cakap tak serupa bikin, kononnya jadi pelopor demokrasi, tapi sebenarnya menafikan hak rakyat. Kerajaan dulu dituduh autokratik, walhal Anwar sendiri mentadbir dengan kuku besi,” tegasnya.

Media sebelum ini melaporkan amaran Anwar bahawa pihak berkuasa akan mengambil tindakan maksimum terhadap mana-mana pihak yang mengganggu gugat keselamatan semasa lawatan Modi, termasuk himpunan GARAH yang menentang pembinaan rumah ibadat haram.#~Borneo Herald™

Anwar Disuruh Berhenti Canang Dia Tegas Anti-Rasuah Jika Kes SMM Sabah Didiamkan

"Jangan banyak sembang, jangan double-standard..." mesej rakyat untuk Perdana Menteri. Gambar hiasan Anwar bersama timbalannya Datuk Zahid Hamidi dan Ketua Menteri Sabah, Datuk Hajiji Noor.

Borneo Herald
2.00PM MYT, 8-2-2026


Oleh Daniel John Jambun 
KOTA KINABALU : Change Advocate Movement Sabah (CAMOS) mengecam keras Perdana Menteri, Datuk Anwar Ibrahim kerana melaungkan integriti dan keadilan, tetapi enggan bertindak terhadap skandal Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd (SMM).

Di pentas-pentas konvensyen parti, PMX lantang bercakap tentang rasuah, penyalahgunaan kuasa dan kononnya mahu “menyelamatkan negara”.

Namun apabila berdepan dengan dakwaan serius melibatkan SMM — termasuk video bocor, dakwaan sogokan, serta persoalan besar mengenai pelesenan mineral — Perdana Menteri tiba-tiba membisu.

Ini bukan kepimpinan.
Ini adalah pengecutan politik.

Anda tidak boleh mendakwa sedang berperang melawan rasuah, sambil melindungi tembok senyap terhadap salah satu skandal tadbir urus terbesar di Sabah.

CAMOS bertanya secara terus terang:

Di mana tangkapan SPRM?
Di mana pendakwaan?
Di mana Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja?

Jika kerajaan ini benar-benar “tidak berkompromi”, mengapa tiada apa-apa bergerak dalam kes SMM?

Rakyat Sabah bukan buta.

Kami melihat tindakan pantas apabila kes melibatkan pihak pembangkang.
Kami melihat keraguan dan kelumpuhan apabila isu menyentuh kepentingan politik yang sensitif.

Itu bukan reformasi.

Itu adalah keadilan terpilih.

Dan keadilan terpilih hanyalah rasuah yang memakai seragam berbeza.

Ketika PMX berucap tentang berbilion ringgit yang dicuri di tempat lain, sumber asli Sabah pula dibiarkan berisiko secara senyap. Ketika Putrajaya bermegah dengan keberanian moral, rakyat Sabah pula dibebani kenaikan tarif elektrik dan kos sara hidup — namun dinafikan jawapan mengenai SMM.

Kerajaan ini tidak boleh menuntut kepercayaan rakyat sambil mengamalkan dwi standard.

Jika PMX benar-benar percaya tiada sesiapa kebal daripada undang-undang, buktikanlah.

CAMOS menuntut:

• Siasatan segera dan telus terhadap SMM;
• Pendedahan penuh kepada umum semua dapatan siasatan;
• Pertuduhan jenayah terhadap setiap individu terlibat — tanpa mengira pangkat, parti atau jawatan;
• Penubuhan Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja yang bebas.

Apa-apa yang kurang daripada ini hanya mengesahkan apa yang ramai sudah syaki: bahawa kempen anti-rasuah PMX bersifat terpilih, bersandiwara, dan mengikut keselesaan politik.

Sabah berhak mendapat keadilan — bukan slogan.
Sabah berhak mendapat akauntabiliti — bukan ucapan.

Rakyat sedang memerhati.


Daniel John Jambun ialah Presiden
Change Advocate Movement Sabah (CAMOS)#~Borneo Herald™

Sarawak Lindungi Rakyatnya, GRS Sabah Menghukum Rakyat?

Borneo Herald 
2.37AM MYT, 5-2-2026


Oleh Daniel John Jambun 
RAKYAT Sabah kini dipaksa membayar tarif elektrik yang lebih tinggi.

Bermula 1 Februari 2026, purata tarif elektrik di Sabah dan Labuan dinaikkan daripada 34.52 sen per kWh kepada 39.70 sen per kWh — peningkatan kira-kira 5 sen per kWh (≈15%).

Sebaliknya, di Sarawak, tarif elektrik tidak dinaikkan dan kekal antara yang terendah di Malaysia, dengan kadar domestik biasa sekitar 18 sen hingga 31.5 sen per kWh bergantung kepada tahap penggunaan.

Perbezaan ketara ini menceritakan kisah sebenar.

Maka mari kita ajukan soalan yang jelas:

> Jika Sarawak mampu melindungi rakyatnya daripada kos elektrik yang lebih tinggi, mengapa Sabah tidak?

Jawapannya mudah: kegagalan kepimpinan.

Sarawak mentadbir.
GRS hanya mengimprovisasi.

Di Sarawak, penjanaan dan pengagihan elektrik diurus oleh Sarawak Energy — sebuah utiliti milik negeri yang diurus secara profesional, disokong oleh perancangan jangka panjang, pelaburan hidro, dan hala tuju dasar yang jelas.

Sarawak menganggap elektrik sebagai perkhidmatan awam strategik.

GRS menganggap elektrik sebagai masalah yang perlu dilonggokkan kepada pengguna.

Itulah sebabnya Sarawak menyerap kos secara dalaman.

Sabah pula memindahkan kos secara terus kepada rakyat.

Kekacauan tenaga Sabah adalah buatan sendiri

Di Sabah, elektrik dikendalikan oleh Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd — sebuah utiliti yang lumpuh akibat:

• puluhan tahun kekurangan pelaburan
• infrastruktur usang
• kebergantungan kepada diesel yang mahal
• tadbir urus yang lemah
• ketiadaan visi tenaga jangka panjang

Ini tidak berlaku dalam sekelip mata.

Ia berlaku kerana kerajaan demi kerajaan — termasuk pentadbiran GRS hari ini — gagal merancang, gagal melakukan pembaharuan, dan gagal menjamin autonomi tenaga Sabah.

Kini rakyat Sabah dipaksa membayar harga atas ketidakcekapan itu.

“Tidak dapat dielakkan”? Tidak — ini harga ketidakcekapan.

Melabel kenaikan tarif ini sebagai “tidak dapat dielakkan”, seperti didakwa oleh Hajiji Noor, adalah satu sikap pengecut politik.

Sarawak juga berdepan peningkatan kos.

Sarawak memilih kepimpinan.

Sabah memilih alasan.

Mari kita jujur sepenuhnya:

> Kenaikan tarif ini bukan berpunca daripada harga tenaga global.
Ia berpunca daripada kegagalan politik tempatan.

Siapa yang menderita?

Bukan menteri.
Bukan lantikan politik.
Bukan pengerusi GLC.

Yang menanggung beban ialah:

• pemilik kedai kecil
• keluarga luar bandar
• pesara
• petani
• penjaja
• usahawan mikro

GRS melindungi kuasa — bukan rakyat.

Kerajaan yang gagal mengurus elektrik tidak layak mentadbir Sabah

Elektrik adalah asas tadbir urus.

Jika GRS gagal memastikan bekalan elektrik mampu milik di salah sebuah negeri termiskin Malaysia, maka ia tidak mempunyai autoriti moral untuk memberi syarahan kepada rakyat Sabah tentang pembangunan.

Sarawak merancang.
Sabah tersadung.

Sarawak melindungi rakyatnya.
GRS menghukum rakyatnya.

Kata akhir

Sabah tidak kekurangan sumber semula jadi.

Sabah kekurangan kepimpinan yang berwibawa.

Kenaikan tarif ini — daripada 34.52 sen kepada 39.70 sen per kWh — adalah bil awam atas kegagalan GRS.

Dan rakyat Sabah dipaksa membayarnya.


Daniel John Jambun ialah Presiden
Change Advocate Movement Sabah (CAMOS)#~Borneo Herald™

Search This Blog