KUCHING:  The latest move by the state government to issue two longhouse with  strata titles has brought on many unanswered questions, key among them  is whether or not the commercial banks will recognise these ‘titles’ for  loans and mortages and if this latest exercise was yet another  political bid to mislead natives into an “illusory” sense of security.
A senior native customary right (NCR) lawyer here, Baru Bian said  Housing Minister Abang Johari Tun Openg’s bid to issue strata titles for  longhouses was also in contradiction with the statement made by the  Land and Survey Department.
He said that in April 2010, when this matter was brought up, the Land  and Survey Department said that the Strata Title Ordinance did not  apply to longhouses where the issuance of title was concerned.
In that statement the Land and Survey Department had clarified that  the Strata Title Ordinance did not apply to longhouses when it came to  issuance of title.
Bian, who is also Ba’Kelalan assemblyman, said the Land and Survey  department had in fact said that Sarawak Land Code title would be more  appropriate for longhouses because strata title was not relevant for  individual bilik (door) of the longhouses.
Describing Abang Johari’s decision as ‘absurd and impractical’, Bian  said: “Much as I welcome any move to secure the interests of the NCR  landowners, there are some questions about this latest development that  need to be answered so that all parties are clear on the purpose and the  actual benefits and the practicality of this exercise.
“The first question I have is whether the strata titles will be  issued under the Strata Title Ordinance or under the Sarawak Land Code.
“It is to be noted that the Strata Title Ordinance applies to buildings five-storeys and higher.
“My second question is whether the banks have been consulted about the acceptability of these bilik (door) strata titled.
“Can they be used as collateral for bank loans in view of the fact  that the minister had announced that individual titles can be accepted  as such.
Don’t mislead natives
“In the hypothetical situation that a loan was actually taken out  with a bilik title as collateral and the bilik was put up for auction as  a result of non-payment, who would take up the offer?
“My third question is: Does the issuance of bilik strata titles have  any bearing on whether insurance companies are willing to insure  longhouses against fire?”
Bian said there were many factors which determined whether or not insurance coverage will be extended to such bilik’.
“Will an individual title will override these considerations.
“The question of ownership and inheritance of a bilik is a non-issue, as there is an adat to provide for this.
“Let us not lose sight of the fact that what is really important to  the indigenous people is security of the lands surrounding their  longhouses, the temuda, the orchard or fruit groves, pemakai menua and  pulau galau,” said Bian, who is Sarawak PKR chairman
He added that it would be “preferred and more meaningful” if the  government could issue titles to the owners for these lands under  Section 18 of the Sarawak Land Code.
“This would be of real value and would secure the interests of the people.
“Considering the fact that the issuance of bilik titles will be of no  real benefit to the longhouse dwellers, and taking into account the  timing of this announcement, the more cynical amongst us will naturally  question the motive behind this exercise.
“The indigenous people must not be misled into an illusory sense of  security for political purposes,” said Bian, who is also the Ba’Kelalan  assemblyman.

BARU IS RIGHT.
ReplyDeleteTHIS IS A TREND TOWARDS PRIVATISATION WHICH WILL ONLY HURT THE POOR LONG HOUSE DWELLERS.
HOW ARE THE LONGHOUSE DWELLERS GOING TO PAY FOR BODY CORP (MANAGEMENT) FEES. COUNCIL & WATER RATES WHEN THEY DON'T PAY ANYTHING NOW?
PRIOR TO TAIB MAHMUD'S DICTATORSHIP THE NCR PEOPLE'S RIGHTS WERE SECURE AS THEIR RIGHTS WERE BY AND LARGE RESPECTED BY MOST PARTIES